5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law
5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law
Blog Article
Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights even though respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. On the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided because of the decision of your Supreme Court while in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are missing while in the present case. In these types of circumstances, this petition is found to become not maintainable and is particularly dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
Though the punishment may be severe, its purpose isn't solely to seek vengeance but to prevent probable offenders and copyright the principles of justice and social order.
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the summary or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may perhaps interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mildew the relief to make it correct to the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified by the decision in the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Information on accessing opinions and case-related documents for the Supreme Court of the United States is accessible on the court’s website.
record of your department there isn't any record offered whatsoever regarding promotion with the petitioner(Promotion)
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
If a target is shot at point-blank vary, it might still be fair to infer that the accused meant death. However, that is not always the case.
In fact, this provision nullifies the difference between manslaughter and murder. Section 318 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 defines Qatl-i-khata (manslaughter) as “Whoever, without intention to cause the death of or cause harm to your person causes death of this sort of person, either by mistake of act or by mistake of fact is claimed to commit qatl-i-khata.”
The law as set up in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability from the matter, but couldn't be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this kind of ruling, the defendants took their request into the appellate court.
Using keywords effectively is also essential. Think about using synonyms and variations of your keywords to make sure you seize all relevant results. Understanding the citation system used by Pakistani courts will also help you pinpoint specific cases.
PACER allows any one with an account to search and locate appellate, district, and bankruptcy court case and docket information. Register to get a PACER account.
share or interest of the co-owner in immovable property may sold to another co-owner/co-sharer and even to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should also be dismissed. Suffice is to look at that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are fully different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case regulation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has here been held because of the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--